Freedom of information (FOI) releases from LFB

This is a disclosure log of London Fire Brigade's responses to freedom of information (FOI) or environmental information regulations (EIR) requests that might be of wider public interest.

If you can't find the information you're looking for, you can make a new FOI request.

Filters

Clear filters
  • Keywords filters

  • Year filters

  • Month filters

980 disclosures

  1. We would like to request Historical fires and enforcement notices on Kingsley Lodge W1G 9UG. Under freedom of information Act 2000.

    Published: 15 September 2026

  2. Under the Freedom of Information Act 2000, I would like to request the following information regarding Fire Control personnel undertaking roles outside of Fire Control within your Service. Information Requested Does your Service currently employ, or has it employed within the last five years, any Fire Control staff who have moved into operational, community safety, prevention, protection, resilience, emergency planning, training, or other uniformed supervisory/managerial roles? If yes, please provide: The job title of the role(s). Whether the individual remained substantively employed within Control or permanently transferred departments. The terms and conditions of employment applicable to the role (e.g. Grey Book, Green Book, local agreement, etc.). The rank or grade held by the individual. What criteria were used to determine the individual's suitability and eligibility for the role? Did the Service require the individual to: Maintain Fire Control competence? Attend Fire Control for refresher training or operational assurance purposes? Complete additional operational, management, incident command, prevention, protection, resilience, or specialist training? Are there any policies, procedures, frameworks, talent pathway programmes, promotion processes, or workforce planning arrangements that enable Fire Control staff to progress into roles outside of Control? Has your Service produced any guidance, policy documents, business cases, job evaluations, or legal advice relating to Fire Control staff undertaking positions traditionally occupied by operational personnel? If applicable, please provide copies of any policies, procedures, role maps, eligibility criteria, or guidance documents relating to: Fire Control staff transferring into operational support roles. Fire Control staff undertaking Watch Manager, Station Manager, or equivalent supervisory roles. Competence, development, and maintenance of skills for such roles. Has your Service considered Fire Control experience as meeting all or part of the requirements for supervisory or managerial roles outside Control? If so, please provide details of the assessment criteria used. How many Fire Control employees have been appointed to non-Control supervisory or management roles between 1 January 2021 and the date of this request? Please provide any anonymised examples where a Control employee has successfully progressed to roles within: Community Safety / Prevention Protection Emergency Planning Resilience Training and Development Operational Assurance Service Improvement Any other uniformed management role Can all information requested please be sent via email to n-

    Published: 15 September 2026

  3. I am currently undertaking an environmental assessment for a site at CCF, Beddington Farm Road, Croydon, Surrey, CR0 4XB (site plan attached). During the site inspection, the building on the south western side of the site had some fire damage. This was a result of a fire that broke out in c.December 2024, coming from the adjacent site previous called 'Deadcerts Recovery'. Please could you provide any records you may have on this fire, including potential foams used on site?

    Published: 15 September 2026

  4. Last August, the LFB attended our address following a similar incident, when a number of smoke alarms in flats (but not neighbouring properties) around Claremont Square/Amwell Street were going off at the same time. Your crew came into our flat to investigate, as our alarm was also sounding despite there being no obvious fire or smoke. We are now experiencing what appears to be the same issue again. Our smoke alarm is activating randomly, without any apparent trigger. What is particularly concerning is that we have again noticed alarms going off in flats in other, separate buildings around Claremont Square at approximately the same time. None of the other alarms within our own building appear to be activating. Given that this has happened before and that your team attended our property last August, I would be grateful if you could check whether there have been similar incidents or false-alarm callouts in the Claremont Square/Angel area, and whether there could be a common external cause. Please could you advise whether this is something you can investigate further?

    Published: 15 September 2026

  5. 1. Any current policy, procedure, guidance, operational note, risk assessment template, or standard process used when crews or officers identify that a road, street, estate, industrial site, or similar location may be difficult or impossible to access because of parked/stored vehicles or vehicle-related obstruction. 2. Any process for reporting such access concerns to another body, including the police, highways authority, local authority enforcement, parking enforcement, environmental health, planning, licensing, or landowner. 3. Whether your service has, in the last three calendar years, referred any such access obstruction concern to the police or a highways/local authority team. If held, please provide the number of referrals by calendar year. I do not require personal data or exact addresses; broad categories or anonymised examples are sufficient. 4. Whether your service uses or refers to the Highway Code, including Rule 243, when considering or explaining emergency access obstruction by parked vehicles. If held, please provide any recorded guidance, email template, briefing note, or standard wording that mentions this. 5. Any recorded examples, with personal data and precise addresses redacted if necessary, of how your service has advised residents, businesses, councils, police, or highways teams about maintaining access for fire appliances or BRVs where vehicle parking/storage was the concern. If answering all parts would exceed the cost limit, please prioritise questions 1, 2 and 4, and provide advice and assistance on how the remaining parts could be refined. I would prefer the response by email. Please redact personal data where required; I am seeking policy/process information rather than information about identifiable individuals.

    Published: 15 September 2026

  6. I would like to know what the service's policy is on listing stations when publishing an incident on the incident page. 1. Specifically, I'd like to know what concerns the service had identified, what the reasoning and/or views the service had when deciding that information would be something they would include for incidents. 2. What was for publishing them? 3. What was against publishing them? I ask this information because I am interested in why some brigades list stations and others don't and the reasons behind this.

    Published: 14 September 2026

  7. I would like to request a tally of the total number of individuals on which you hold any records currently recorded as residing at the following address: 27 Uxbridge Road (Hayes). Please kindly comprehensively search your systems for data about individuals in any form along the following lines. Please then, if you have not already done so in the first step, search your systems for Personal Emergency Evacuation Plans (ie: PEEPs), or any other records held in connection therewith, as defined under the recently introduced fire safety legislation. Please provide specific figures of: • Those who have further specified room or unit numbers within that address. (Eg: Room 208, Unit 303, Studio 1119, #509, or similar) • Those who have not specified any room/unit numbers within the building but only given the building’s own street address in whatever form or other as their address. • Those who have specified unit numbers that end in any of: ‘02’, ‘15’, or ‘16’, but which do not begin with the digit '0'. (IE: 102, 202, 302, 402, 502, 602, 702, 802, 902, 1002, 1102, 1202, 1302, 115, 215, 315, 415, 515, 615, 715, 815, 915, 1015, 1115, 1215, 1315, 116, 216, 316, 416, 516, 616, 716, 816, 916, 1016, 1116, 1216, or 1316.) For each of the above three bullet points, please provide the figures that were presently accurate on each of the following dates: * 15 Nov 2024 * 03 Apr 2025 * 03 Oct 2025 and, at the end of each of the following months: * Dec 2024 * Feb 2025 * May 2025 * Jul 2025 * Sep 2025 * Dec 2025 * May 2026 Please note that there are some confusions and discrepancies whereby sometimes the postcode of this building is indicated as UB4 0UG and sometimes it is indicated as UB4 0JN. The name of the property is sometimes variously called ‘&Soul’ or ‘And Soul’ or ‘Andsoul’ or ‘And – soul’ or possibly some other variation of this, and this may conceivably be substituted for the street number, or perhaps combined with it. I am not seeking any personal data, names, or medical information. Furthermore, I am only seeking an aggregate tally of individuals who are registered in your records with some permutation or variation of that address. In case any particular figure is less than 5 and so felt to be at risk of personally identifying any person, then please simply provide the figure rounded to a range as ‘>0<6’. In case it is more than 5, yet less than 11, then please simply give it as bounded range of >5<11, in case this is felt necessary to avoid disclosing individuals' personal information. In case the figure is 11 or more, then please certainly just give the precise figure. Finally, in general, please provide any general (ie, non-person-specific) data held by your organisation in relation to the aforementioned address. (27 Uxbridge Road, UB4 0UG and/or UB4 0JN)

    Published: 14 September 2026

  8. I am making a further Freedom of information request for LFB to provide the following information regarding the Buildings : Bailey House, Butterfield House, & Bush House at: Master Gunner Place Berber Parade London SE18 4GD The building owners Samnas Limited and their Management company Rendall & Rittner have received many LFB Enforcement Notices since 2020 regarding these Buildings. The latest Enforcements issued to Samnas Limited In relation to the serious fire Safety failings at the three Buildings were issued by LFB on 4/12/2024 requiring Compliance by 4/12/25 (see attached). The building owners and their management again did not comply with the Enforcements. Please provide the communication from LFB to Samnas Limited and Rendall & Rittner following their Non Compliance with the 4/12/2024 Notices and the action being taken by LFB since 4/12/2025. Also please provide details of all the Current Enforcements and Deficiency Notices issued to Samnas Limited and Rendall & Rittner In relation to these Buildings. Also please supply an updated Copy of the LFB log showing all visits made to these Buildings at Master Gunner Place from 2020 to date.

    Published: 14 September 2026

  9. I write to request information under the Freedom of Information Act 2000 concerning the fatal fire that occurred on 1 January 2023 at Old Kent Road, London.

    I would be grateful if you could provide copies of the following documents and information held by the London Fire Brigade.

    1. The complete Fatal Fire Investigation Report, including all appendices, photographs, diagrams, plans and supporting documents.

    2. The complete Specialist Fire Safety Officer (SFSO) Report, including all appendices and supporting documentation.

    3. Any post-incident audit, post-fire audit, fire safety audit, review or inspection carried out following this incident, together with all associated reports, correspondence and internal notes.

    4. All documents relating to the Fire Risk Assessment (FRA) for the premises, including copies of all FRAs held by the London Fire Brigade, together with any correspondence, emails or internal discussions regarding whether the FRA was suitable and sufficient.

    5. All correspondence, including emails, letters and internal communications, between the London Fire Brigade and:

    * HM Coroner or the Coroner’s Office;

    * the London Borough of Southwark;

    * the Metropolitan Police;

    * any other public authority, relating to this incident.

    6. Any internal communications, reports or decision logs concerning:

    * the consideration of a Prevention of Future Deaths Report;

    * requests received from the Coroner;

    * the preparation of information for the Coroner;

    * the reasons for any delay in providing information requested by the Coroner.

    7. Any documents explaining the decision not to carry out, or to delay, a post-fire audit following this fatal incident.

    8. Any London Fire Brigade policies, guidance or operational procedures that were in force at the time concerning:

    * fatal fire investigations;

    * post-fire audits;

    * obtaining and reviewing Fire Risk Assessments;

    * liaison with HM Coroner;

    * investigations involving Houses in Multiple Occupation (HMOs).

    9. Any lessons learned reports, debrief reports, recommendations or internal reviews arising from this incident.

    10. Any records showing when the London Fire Brigade first obtained a copy of the Fire Risk Assessment for the premises.

    11. Copies of all witness statements, interview records, contemporaneous notes or written accounts obtained from London Fire Brigade personnel in relation to this incident, including firefighters, fire investigators, Specialist Fire Safety Officers and officers in attendance.

    12. Any documents, reports, analyses, timelines, diagrams, photographs, videos or other records relating to the progression and development of the fire, including any assessment or reconstruction of how the fire spread throughout the building.

    13. Any documents, reports, witness statements, notes or analyses relating to the behaviour and movements of the occupants during the incident, including:

    * attempts to escape;

    * rescue attempts;

    * observations made by firefighters;

    * any survivability assessments;

    * any analysis of the actions of those present during the fire.

    14. Copies of any investigation logs, decision logs, contemporaneous notes, notebooks, electronic records or other investigation documents created during the investigation that have not previously been disclosed.

    15. Copies of any photographs, video recordings, body-worn video, drone footage or other visual evidence held by the London Fire Brigade relating to this incident, where disclosure is not otherwise prohibited by law.

    If any of the requested information is exempt from disclosure, please identify the specific exemption relied upon and provide any information that can be disclosed with appropriate redactions. If complying with the entire request would exceed the appropriate cost limit under section 12 of the Freedom of Information Act 2000, I would be grateful if you could advise me how the request may be refined so that the maximum amount of information can be provided. I look forward to your response within the statutory 20 working days.

    Published: 11 September 2026

  10. I write under the Freedom of Information Act 2000 to request disclosure of records relating to the fatal fire at Old Kent Road, SE15 on 1 January 2023, which resulted in the death of [X] and injuries to multiple other occupants.

    Accordingly, please provide:

    1. The full and complete Bureau Veritas report(s), including:

    * all appendices;

    * photographs;

    * diagrams;

    * technical findings;

    * internal notes;

    * conclusions;

    * recommendations;

    * draft versions;

    * and any supplementary or follow-up reports.

    2. Any instructions, terms of reference, or scope of work provided to Bureau Veritas by the London Fire Brigade, including clarification of:

    * whether Bureau Veritas was instructed only to investigate the cause of the fire;

    * or whether it was also instructed to investigate:

    * fire progression;

    * compartmentation;

    * means of escape;

    * smoke spread;

    * fire safety compliance;

    * HMO fire risks;

    * operational response;

    * survivability;

    * and/or rescue opportunities.

    3. Any correspondence between the London Fire Brigade and Bureau Veritas concerning:

    * limitation or restriction of the investigation scope;

    * decisions not to investigate fire safety matters;

    * decisions not to produce a fire progression analysis;

    * decisions relating to post-fire audits;

    * or discussions concerning responsibility for reviewing the Fire Risk Assessment (FRA).

    4. Any documents recording:

    * whether the FRA obtained on or around 3 January 2023 was reviewed or scrutinised;

    * whether any post-audit review was conducted;

    * whether any enforcement considerations arose;

    * and whether any fire safety failings were identified in relation to the premises.

    5. Any documents explaining why no further fire safety findings or recommendations appear within the Bureau Veritas material disclosed to date, despite:

    * the premises being a multi-occupancy residential building above commercial premises;

    * one fatality and multiple injuries occurring;

    * and ongoing concerns regarding means of escape and fire safety management. If any exemptions are relied upon, please:

    * identify the specific exemption(s);

    * explain why they apply; * and disclose all reasonably severable material.

    Where information is held but considered exempt in part, I request disclosure of redacted versions where possible. This request is made in the public interest due to ongoing concerns regarding fire safety oversight, investigative transparency, and lessons learned following a fatal residential fire.

    Published: 11 September 2026