Freedom of information (FOI) releases from LFB

This is a disclosure log of London Fire Brigade's responses to freedom of information (FOI) or environmental information regulations (EIR) requests that might be of wider public interest.

If you can't find the information you're looking for, you can make a new FOI request.

Filters

Clear filters
  • Keywords filters

  • Year filters

  • Month filters

836 disclosures

  1. I would like to know the callsign, time mobilised, time on scene, time available for all pumps/fire engines and specialist appliances that attended Fencepiece Road, Chigwell on the 14/06/2025. If available- please also provide width, length of building(s) involved and percentage alight. please provide the data in a microsoft excel format.

    Published: 1 July 2026

  2. I would like to request the number of house fires over the last five years that were due to an electrical fault.

    If it is possible I would also like this broken up by town in your authority.

    Published: 1 July 2026

  3. I request copies of all information held by the London Fire Brigade (LFB) relating to the speed cushions installed on Belmont Hill and Lee Terrace, SE13 (hereafter 'the scheme'), and the matters set out below. 1. STATUTORY CONSULTATION a) Any consultation conducted by the London Borough of Lewisham with LFB prior to or during the installation of the scheme, including the date(s) on which any such consultation was carried out. b) LFB's formal response, if any, to that consultation, including any objections, conditions, or recommendations made. c) Any records showing whether LFB was consulted specifically as a statutory consultee in connection with any Traffic Regulation Order or Road Humps Order made for the scheme, as required under Regulation 3(b) of the Highways (Road Humps) Regulations 1999. d) Any consultation conducted by the London Borough of Lewisham with LFB prior to the subsequent enlargement of the speed cushions, as required under section 12.4 of LFB Guidance Note GN29 (Access for Fire Appliances), and LFB's response to that consultation. e) Any subsequent correspondence between LFB and the London Borough of Lewisham regarding the scheme at any stage. 2. LFB POLICY ON ROAD HUMPS AND SPEED CUSHIONS a) LFB's current policy or standing position on the installation of road humps or speed cushions on roads forming part of fire appliance response routes, including any standard objection criteria. b) The equivalent policy that was in force at the time the scheme was installed. c) Any LFB guidance on the maximum height of road humps or speed cushions considered acceptable on fire appliance routes, and the basis for that parameter. I note that GN29 section 12.6(b) states that humps of 50mm high are preferable to those of 75mm or 100mm high, and would be grateful for confirmation of the current position, given that the cushions in the scheme are 75mm or higher. d) Any LFB policy or guidance on the maximum width of speed cushions on fire appliance routes, including whether LFB's position distinguishes between cushions that allow appliances to straddle and those that require wheels to mount the cushion, and the implications of each for appliance performance and crew safety. e) Whether GN29, or any successor or supplementary document, contains or has contained any specific requirement or recommendation regarding speed cushion width in relation to fire appliance rear wheel track dimensions, and if so, the details of that requirement. 3. FIRE APPLIANCE REAR WHEEL TRACK WIDTHS AND STRADDLING a) For each class of fire appliance currently operated by LFB, including as a minimum the standard pumping appliance and aerial appliances (turntable ladders and hydraulic platforms), please provide: (i) The distance between the inner edges of the innermost rear tyres, this being the critical dimension that determines whether a speed cushion can be straddled without the rear tyres contacting the cushion; (ii) Confirmation of whether current pumping appliances run dual rear wheels (two tyres side by side on each side of the rear axle), and if so, the clear gap between the inner faces of the innermost rear tyres on each axle configuration. I note that GN29 (Rev 15, 2023) does not include these figures in its current Table 1, and request that LFB provide them from its current vehicle specifications. b) Based on that inner tyre gap, the maximum speed cushion width that LFB considers would allow each class of appliance to straddle a cushion without the innermost rear tyres contacting it, taking into account any necessary clearance tolerance. c) Whether, in LFB's assessment, speed cushions of 1,900mm width (or any width exceeding the inner tyre gap of LFB pumping appliances) would result in the rear tyres of those appliances contacting or mounting the cushion, and if so, what LFB's position is on the installation of such cushions on fire appliance response routes. d) Any LFB assessment, guidance, or correspondence addressing the operational and safety consequences of fire appliance rear wheels being required to mount speed cushions rather than straddle them, including any impact on: (i) appliance speed and response times; (ii) crew safety and comfort; (iii) vehicle handling, including the effect of water movement in tanks when traversing cushions at speed; (iv) wear or damage to the appliance. 4. RESPONSE ROUTES AND REROUTING a) Whether Belmont Hill or Lee Terrace, SE13, forms part of a designated primary or secondary fire appliance response route for any LFB station. b) Whether LFB has altered, reviewed, or considered altering any response routes in the SE13 area as a result of the scheme. c) Any records of fire appliances being rerouted to avoid the speed cushions on this road, and any assessment of the impact of such rerouting on response times. 5. RESPONSE TIME IMPACT a) Any data held by LFB on response times to incidents on or near Belmont Hill and Lee Terrace, SE13, for a period of twelve months before and the period since the installation of the scheme, and separately following the enlargement of the cushions. b) Any LFB assessment or correspondence attributing changes in response times in this area to the scheme or to road calming measures more generally on this corridor. c) Any analysis carried out by LFB on the cumulative impact of road humps or speed cushions on response times across the London Borough of Lewisham, or any borough-level report in which this road or scheme is referenced. 6. VEHICLE DAMAGE, CREW SAFETY, AND OPERATIONAL INCIDENTS a) Any reports of damage to LFB vehicles attributed to the speed cushions on this road. b) Any reports of injury to, or complaints from, LFB crew members relating to the traversal of the speed cushions on this road, including any musculoskeletal or impact-related concerns. c) Any incident reports or near-miss records in which the speed cushions on this road are identified as a contributing factor. d) Any records relating to the effect of traversing speed cushions or road humps at speed on water movement within fire appliance tanks, and any associated vehicle handling or safety concerns raised by crews operating on this road or in this area. 7. OPERATIONAL CONSEQUENCES a) Any records of LFB raising concerns, formally or informally, with the London Borough of Lewisham or any other body about the operational impact of the scheme. b) Any internal LFB communications, meeting notes, or reports discussing the scheme or its impact on emergency response in the SE13 area.

    Published: 29 June 2026

  4. Abbey Community Centre, 172 Belsize Rd, London NW6 4BJ

    In order to fully understand the basis of the Brigade’s assessment, we would be grateful if you could provide or direct us to the following information where available:

    • The audit findings relating to the inspection carried out in November 2025.

    • The recommendations that were provided to the Responsible Person following the audit .

    • The occupancy and capacity assumptions used when assessing the premises.

    • Any assumptions regarding staffing levels or management arrangements during building use.

    • Clarification of the statement in the Stage 1 response that upgrading the door mechanisms may require “removal of a wall”

    • Confirmation of whether all final exit doors serving the ground floor premises were inspected as part of the audit.

    • Confirmation of the role of the officer(s) who carried out the audit, and the capacity in which the assessment was undertaken (for example whether it formed part of a formal inspection, advisory visit, or supervised assessment)

    • General confirmation of the level of competency or qualification framework applied to the audit, in line with the Brigade’s usual practice for assessing public-access premises of this type.

    Published: 26 June 2026

  5. A copy of each of the most up to date fire Safety Guidance Notes (GN).

    Published: 25 June 2026

  6. What fire safety information has been uploaded electronically about Gainsborough Court, College Rd, SE21 7LT. I am interested to know whether any floor plans, and evacuation policy for our building, Gainsborough Court SE21 7LT, have been uploaded electronically since 1st Jan 2026. Ideally I’d also like to know the date when the information was uploaded.

    Published: 24 June 2026

  7. I am writing to request information under the Freedom of Information Act 2000. Please provide records of all London Fire Brigade attendance at the following address since January 2025: 119a Wrythe Lane Carshalton SM5 2RR I am requesting: - Dates and times of all attendances - Reason for attendance (e.g. fire alarm, welfare check, incident response, etc.) - Any available incident reference numbers - Confirmation on which flats activated the alarm If possible, I would appreciate confirmation of whether any repeat callouts have occurred during this period.

    Published: 24 June 2026

  8. I am writing regarding compartmentation drawings for retail properties. Specifically, I would like to know:

    * Under what property dimensions or thresholds does the London Fire Brigade require compartmentation drawings to be submitted for compliance and fire safety review?

    * Are there particular floor area, height, or occupancy limits that trigger this requirement?

    Published: 19 June 2026

  9. Please treat this as a request under the Freedom of Information Act 2000. Please provide the following information relating to Ignatius Sancho Road estate (including Elizabeth Anderson House, Rosa Billinghurst House, Ada Lovelace House and Rosalind Franklin House, and any of the new developments on the estate ) for the period November 2024 to May 2026: 1. The total number of London Fire Brigade attendances to the estate. 2. For each attendance, please provide: - date; - incident category/type; - brief incident description. 3. Copies of any referrals, reports, notifications, recommendations, concerns, or escalations made to the Royal Borough of Greenwich following those attendances. 4. Copies of any correspondence, inspection records, notes, reports or photographs relating to the placement of the fire blanket at Rosa Billinghurst House, including any records identifying concerns regarding its location or impact on escape routes. Please provide copies of the documents where held.

    Published: 18 June 2026

  10. Hello, I am writing to request information under the Freedom of Information Act from your fire service. Please provide data on fires involving e‑bikes or e‑scooters recorded by your fire service. Specifically, I would be grateful for: The annual total number of fires involving e‑bikes or e‑scooters for 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024, 2025, and for the year to date in 2026. A breakdown of these annual totals by device type (e‑bike or e‑scooter). A breakdown of these annual totals by the number of related injuries and fatalities. I would prefer the information to be supplied electronically, ideally in a spreadsheet format. Thanks for your time.

    Published: 18 June 2026